Model comparisons
Which AI model should you use?
Each page puts two models next to each other: what they're for, what they cost per run and, where marked, the same prompt run on both. Pick a pair, or run your own prompt on up to four models at once.
Video models
Same-prompt testKling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for 30-second takes and big reference sets; Kling 3.0 for 4K and Motion Control.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testKling 3.0 vs Wan 3.0Wan 3.0 is the better-value all-rounder with clips up to 30 seconds; Kling 3.0 for a 4K hero shot and Motion Control.See the comparison - Same-prompt testSeedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0Both run 30-second takes with sound; Wan 3.0 starts cheaper, Seedance 2.5 takes far bigger reference sets.See the comparison
Same-prompt testKling 3.0 vs Kling O3Same family look; Omni (O3) adds reference photos and video editing, Kling 3.0 has Motion Control and finer prompt controls.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testSeedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for takes up to 30 seconds; Seedance 2.0 for 4K and a lower price per second.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testKling 3.0 vs MiniMax H3MiniMax H3 is the cheaper way to clips with sound; Kling 3.0 adds 4K, a sound switch and Motion Control.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testSeedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.0 FastSame settings; Mini gave the brighter, cleaner shot for less, Fast went moodier and caught the wave. Neither was quicker in our run.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testSeedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0Full Seedance 2.0 gave the most finished clip; Fast is the cheaper, quicker way to find the shot first.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testHappyHorse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0The two closest to our brief; HappyHorse was quicker and warmer, Seedance 2.0 adds 4K, 480p drafts and extension.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testSeedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0Seedance 2.0 read our brief more closely; Kling 3.0 gave a crisper, steadier wide shot and wins on 4K and Motion Control.See the comparison
Image models
Same-prompt testNano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.5 SunburstNano Banana 2.1 for spelled-right text, 8:1 banners and web search; Sunburst for precise edits and cut-outs.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testNano Banana 2.1 vs Nano Banana ProPro plans dense text and diagrams more carefully; 2.1 is newer, faster and less than half the price.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testSeedream 5.0 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Seedream 5.0 Pro for skin, fabric and layers; Nano Banana 2.1 for text, 4K and web search.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testFLUX.2 Max vs Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Max for photoreal portraits and exact colours; Nano Banana Pro for dense layouts and many references.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testGPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana 2Both spelled our poster perfectly; GPT Image 2 followed the brief to the letter, Nano Banana 2 improvised more.See the comparison 
Same-prompt testGPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana ProTie on text; Nano Banana Pro laid out the poster like a designer and shot the most natural photo, GPT Image 2 is cheaper and makes ten at once.See the comparison
Have your own prompt?
Compare Models sends one prompt to up to four models and shows the results side by side.
About these comparisons
How are these comparisons made?
Specs and prices come straight from our model catalog, so they update when a model changes. Pages marked Same-prompt test also show one run of the same prompt on both models, with the settings, the time it took and the price.
Are the results cherry-picked?
No. For the same-prompt tests we ran each prompt once per model and show the first result. The only edit we make is blurring a real brand name if a model invents one.
Can I compare models that aren't listed here?
Yes. Compare Models runs your prompt on up to four models at once, from any of the image or video models on PopNow.
Do I need a subscription to try both models?
No. PopNow uses one credit balance for every model, and the price of each run shows on the button before you generate.