模型比較
該用哪個 AI 模型？
每一頁把兩個模型放在一起：各自擅長什麼、每次多少點數，標了「同提示詞實測」的還有同一條提示詞在兩邊的成品。挑一組看看，或用自己的提示詞一次跑最多四個模型。
影片模型
同提示詞實測Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for 30-second takes and big reference sets; Kling 3.0 for 4K and Motion Control.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Kling 3.0 vs Wan 3.0Wan 3.0 is the better-value all-rounder with clips up to 30 seconds; Kling 3.0 for a 4K hero shot and Motion Control.查看比較 - 同提示詞實測Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0Both run 30-second takes with sound; Wan 3.0 starts cheaper, Seedance 2.5 takes far bigger reference sets.查看比較
同提示詞實測Kling 3.0 vs Kling O3Same family look; Omni (O3) adds reference photos and video editing, Kling 3.0 has Motion Control and finer prompt controls.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for takes up to 30 seconds; Seedance 2.0 for 4K and a lower price per second.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Kling 3.0 vs MiniMax H3MiniMax H3 is the cheaper way to clips with sound; Kling 3.0 adds 4K, a sound switch and Motion Control.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.0 FastSame settings; Mini gave the brighter, cleaner shot for less, Fast went moodier and caught the wave. Neither was quicker in our run.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0Full Seedance 2.0 gave the most finished clip; Fast is the cheaper, quicker way to find the shot first.查看比較 
同提示詞實測HappyHorse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0The two closest to our brief; HappyHorse was quicker and warmer, Seedance 2.0 adds 4K, 480p drafts and extension.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0Seedance 2.0 read our brief more closely; Kling 3.0 gave a crisper, steadier wide shot and wins on 4K and Motion Control.查看比較
圖片模型
同提示詞實測Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.5 SunburstNano Banana 2.1 for spelled-right text, 8:1 banners and web search; Sunburst for precise edits and cut-outs.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nano Banana ProPro plans dense text and diagrams more carefully; 2.1 is newer, faster and less than half the price.查看比較 
同提示詞實測Seedream 5.0 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Seedream 5.0 Pro for skin, fabric and layers; Nano Banana 2.1 for text, 4K and web search.查看比較 
同提示詞實測FLUX.2 Max vs Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Max for photoreal portraits and exact colours; Nano Banana Pro for dense layouts and many references.查看比較 
同提示詞實測GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana 2Both spelled our poster perfectly; GPT Image 2 followed the brief to the letter, Nano Banana 2 improvised more.查看比較 
同提示詞實測GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana ProTie on text; Nano Banana Pro laid out the poster like a designer and shot the most natural photo, GPT Image 2 is cheaper and makes ten at once.查看比較
有自己的提示詞？
Compare Models 把一條提示詞同時送給最多四個模型，結果並排顯示。
關於這些比較
這些比較是怎麼做的？
規格與價格直接取自我們的模型目錄，模型有變動就跟著更新。標了「同提示詞實測」的頁面，還放了同一條提示詞在兩個模型上各跑一次的結果，附設定、耗時與價格。
結果有挑過嗎？
沒有。同提示詞實測每個模型只跑一次，放第一次的結果。唯一的處理是：模型憑空畫出真實品牌名時，我們會把它模糊掉。
能比較這裡沒列出的模型嗎？
可以。Compare Models 能用你的提示詞一次跑最多四個模型，PopNow 上的圖片與影片模型都能選。
兩個模型都想試，需要訂閱嗎？
不需要。PopNow 所有模型共用一個點數餘額，每次生成前按鈕上都會顯示價格。