模型对比
该用哪个 AI 模型？
每一页把两个模型放在一起：各自擅长什么、每次多少积分，标了「同提示词实测」的还有同一条提示词在两边的成片。选一组看看，或者用自己的提示词一次跑最多四个模型。
视频模型
同提示词实测Kling 3.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for 30-second takes and big reference sets; Kling 3.0 for 4K and Motion Control.查看对比 
同提示词实测Kling 3.0 vs Wan 3.0Wan 3.0 is the better-value all-rounder with clips up to 30 seconds; Kling 3.0 for a 4K hero shot and Motion Control.查看对比 - 同提示词实测Seedance 2.5 vs Wan 3.0Both run 30-second takes with sound; Wan 3.0 starts cheaper, Seedance 2.5 takes far bigger reference sets.查看对比
同提示词实测Kling 3.0 vs Kling O3Same family look; Omni (O3) adds reference photos and video editing, Kling 3.0 has Motion Control and finer prompt controls.查看对比 
同提示词实测Seedance 2.0 vs Seedance 2.5Seedance 2.5 for takes up to 30 seconds; Seedance 2.0 for 4K and a lower price per second.查看对比 
同提示词实测Kling 3.0 vs MiniMax H3MiniMax H3 is the cheaper way to clips with sound; Kling 3.0 adds 4K, a sound switch and Motion Control.查看对比 
同提示词实测Seedance 2.0 Mini vs Seedance 2.0 FastSame settings; Mini gave the brighter, cleaner shot for less, Fast went moodier and caught the wave. Neither was quicker in our run.查看对比 
同提示词实测Seedance 2.0 Fast vs Seedance 2.0Full Seedance 2.0 gave the most finished clip; Fast is the cheaper, quicker way to find the shot first.查看对比 
同提示词实测HappyHorse 1.1 vs Seedance 2.0The two closest to our brief; HappyHorse was quicker and warmer, Seedance 2.0 adds 4K, 480p drafts and extension.查看对比 
同提示词实测Seedance 2.0 vs Kling 3.0Seedance 2.0 read our brief more closely; Kling 3.0 gave a crisper, steadier wide shot and wins on 4K and Motion Control.查看对比
图片模型
同提示词实测Nano Banana 2.1 vs GPT Image 2.5 SunburstNano Banana 2.1 for spelled-right text, 8:1 banners and web search; Sunburst for precise edits and cut-outs.查看对比 
同提示词实测Nano Banana 2.1 vs Nano Banana ProPro plans dense text and diagrams more carefully; 2.1 is newer, faster and less than half the price.查看对比 
同提示词实测Seedream 5.0 Pro vs Nano Banana 2.1Seedream 5.0 Pro for skin, fabric and layers; Nano Banana 2.1 for text, 4K and web search.查看对比 
同提示词实测FLUX.2 Max vs Nano Banana ProFLUX.2 Max for photoreal portraits and exact colours; Nano Banana Pro for dense layouts and many references.查看对比 
同提示词实测GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana 2Both spelled our poster perfectly; GPT Image 2 followed the brief to the letter, Nano Banana 2 improvised more.查看对比 
同提示词实测GPT Image 2 vs Nano Banana ProTie on text; Nano Banana Pro laid out the poster like a designer and shot the most natural photo, GPT Image 2 is cheaper and makes ten at once.查看对比
有自己的提示词？
Compare Models 把一条提示词同时发给最多四个模型，结果并排显示。
关于这些对比
这些对比是怎么做的？
规格和价格直接取自我们的模型目录，模型有变化就跟着更新。标了「同提示词实测」的页面，还放了同一条提示词在两个模型上各跑一次的结果，附设置、耗时和价格。
结果是挑过的吗？
没有。同提示词实测每个模型只跑一次，放第一次的结果。唯一的处理是：模型凭空画出真实品牌名时，我们会把它模糊掉。
能对比这里没列出的模型吗？
可以。Compare Models 能用你的提示词一次跑最多四个模型，PopNow 上的图片和视频模型都能选。
两个模型都想试，需要订阅吗？
不需要。PopNow 所有模型共用一个积分余额，每次生成前按钮上都会显示价格。